方法能傳精神難,善用方法不簡單。
天生精神自己有,博學廣思勤鍛鍊。
Kline 教授說︰
此處 為白努利數。
是歐拉最好的勝利。
作者不知歐拉如何證明得到,不敢亂說。一位知道『留數定理』者
Residue theorem
In complex analysis, the residue theorem, sometimes called Cauchy’s residue theorem, is a powerful tool to evaluate line integrals of analytic functions over closed curves; it can often be used to compute real integrals as well. It generalizes the Cauchy integral theorem and Cauchy’s integral formula. From a geometrical perspective, it is a special case of the generalized Stokes’ theorem.
The statement is as follows:
Let U be a simply connected open subset of the complex plane containing a finite list of points a1, …, an, and f a function defined and holomorphic on U \ {a1,…,an}. Let γ be a closed rectifiable curve in U which does not meet any of the ak, and denote the winding number of γ around ak by I(γ, ak). The line integral of f around γ is equal to 2πi times the sum of residues of f at the points, each counted as many times as γ winds around the point:
If γ is a positively oriented simple closed curve, I(γ, ak) = 1 if ak is in the interior of γ, and 0 if not, so
with the sum over those ak inside γ.
The relationship of the residue theorem to Stokes’ theorem is given by the Jordan curve theorem. The general plane curve γ must first be reduced to a set of simple closed curves {γi} whose total is equivalent to γ for integration purposes; this reduces the problem to finding the integral of f dz along a Jordan curve γi with interior V. The requirement that f be holomorphic on U0 = U \ {ak} is equivalent to the statement that the exterior derivative d(f dz) = 0 on U0. Thus if two planar regions V and W of U enclose the same subset {aj} of {ak}, the regions V \ W and W \ V lie entirely in U0, and hence
is well-defined and equal to zero. Consequently, the contour integral of f dz along γj = ∂V is equal to the sum of a set of integrals along paths λj, each enclosing an arbitrarily small region around a single aj — the residues of f (up to the conventional factor 2πi) at {aj}. Summing over {γj}, we recover the final expression of the contour integral in terms of the winding numbers {I(γ, ak)}.
In order to evaluate real integrals, the residue theorem is used in the following manner: the integrand is extended to the complex plane and its residues are computed (which is usually easy), and a part of the real axis is extended to a closed curve by attaching a half-circle in the upper or lower half-plane, forming a semicircle. The integral over this curve can then be computed using the residue theorem. Often, the half-circle part of the integral will tend towards zero as the radius of the half-circle grows, leaving only the real-axis part of the integral, the one we were originally interested in.
倒是可以藉著
Example 2
The fact that π cot(πz) has simple poles with residue one at each integer can be used to compute the sum
Consider, for example, f(z) = z−2. Let ΓN be the rectangle that is the boundary of [−N − 1/2, N + 1/2]2 with positive orientation, with an integer N. By the residue formula,
- .
The left-hand side goes to zero as N → ∞ since the integrand has order O(N−2). On the other hand,[1]
(In fact, z/2 cot(z/2) = iz/1 − e−iz − iz/2.) Thus, the residue Resz = 0 is −π2/3. We conclude:
which is a proof of the Basel problem.
The same trick can be used to establish
that is, the Eisenstein series.
We take f(z) = (w − z)−1 with w a non-integer and we shall show the above for w. The difficulty in this case is to show the vanishing of the contour integral at infinity. We have:
since the integrand is an even function and so the contributions from the contour in the left-half plane and the contour in the right cancel each other out. Thus,
goes to zero as N → ∞.
See the corresponding article in French Wikipedia for further examples.
與白努利數生成函數 的『偶函數』部份
以及
得到兩種 之『表達式』。
因此就『ㄡㄌㄚ˙』得知矣☆